Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441
Original file (BC 2013 04441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04441

	XXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  YES

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 22 Sep 10, 28 Mar 12, and 27 Dec 12, be declared void and removed or corrected to show “Exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had an unknown pre-existing medical condition that precluded him from successfully passing the contested FAs.  

In support of his appeal the applicant submits a memorandum from his supervisor addressed to his commander explaining that a heart condition, Atrial Septal Defect, contributed to his unsatisfactory FA scores, and a Medical Determination letter, dated 13 Aug 13, signed by his medical provider validating his medical condition.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On the date of the contested FAs the applicant was serving as a Staff Sergeant (E-5) in the Regular Air Force.

On 22 Sep 10, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 83.20, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio – 11:49/52.40 points, Abdominal Circumference – 33.50”/20.00 points, Push-ups – 40/6.80 points, Sit-ups – 38/4.00 points.

On 28 Mar 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 81.90, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio – 12:07/50.90 points, Abdominal Circumference – 32.00”/20.00 points, Push-ups – 37/6.00 points, Sit-ups – 40/5.00 points.

On 27 Dec 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 23.50, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio – 16:12/0.00 points, Abdominal Circumference – 36.00"/17.00 points, Push-ups – 39/6.50 points, Sit-ups – 39/0.00 points.

A “Medical Condition Determination” letter, dated 13 Aug 13, provided by the applicant, and signed by his medical provider, indicates that he “had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion” of all three contested FAs.

On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.”   

A list of the applicant’s last 10 FAs is as follows: 

Date 
Composite Score
Sit-Ups
Rating
5 Feb 14
82.00
Exempt
Satisfactory
19 Jun 13
79.00
Exempt
Satisfactory
25 Feb 13
85.00
Exempt
Satisfactory
*27 Dec 12
23.50
39/0.00
Unsatisfactory
25 Jun 12
84.70
47/8.00
Satisfactory
*28 Mar 12
81.90
40/5.00
Unsatisfactory
8 Sep 11
85.20
44/6.50
Satisfactory
7 Nov 10
88.90
50/8.70
Satisfactory
*22 Sep 10
83.20
38/4.00
Unsatisfactory
25 Mar 10
84.05
36/7.30
Good
*Contested FA

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove FAs, dated 28 Mar 12 and 27 Dec 12, due to lack of supporting evidence.  However, they recommend the 22 Sep 10 FA be removed, as the documentation provided is sufficient to corroborate the applicant's statement.

DPSIM states, the applicant has not provided documentation from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the 28 Mar 12 and 27 Dec 12 FAs.  IAW AFI 36-2905_AFGM3, dated 3 Jan 12, and AFGM4; dated 26 Jun 12, paragraph l0a, "If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results." Also, there is no AF Form 469, AF Form 422, AF Form 108, or Medical Provider's memorandum for record stating any specific component exemption for any of the FAs in question. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).

In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submits; an AF Form 469 detailing restrictions of his medical condition; another copy of the letter from his medical provider indicating “he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score” on all three FAs, and a letter from his commander requesting removal of all the contested FAs. 

A complete copy of the applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we believe he has met his burden of establishing the contested FAs should be declared void. The FAAB disapproved the request, based on insufficient evidence to support the contention and AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the FAs dated, 28 Mar 12 and 27 Dec 12 stating, “he has not provided documentation from his unit commander indicating his decision to invalidate the FAs.”  However, in response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant provided a signed letter from his commander requesting the contested FAs be invalidated.  Furthermore, we recognize the “Medical Determination Letter” and his medical records validate his medical condition and that it did in fact preclude him from passing the FAs.  Given the applicant provided the updated documentation and noting the severity of his medical condition, we find a totality of the evidence supports favorable consideration of this request. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessments, dated 22 Sep 10, 28 Mar 12, and 27 Dec 12, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04441 in Executive Session on 24 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXX, Chair
	XXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXX, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Sep 13, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 4 Dec 13 w/atchs.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Apr 14.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Aug 14 w/atchs.
	

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443

    Original file (BC 2013 05443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a “Medical Determination” letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939

    Original file (BC 2013 04939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078

    Original file (BC 2013 03078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279

    Original file (BC 2013 05279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04345

    Original file (BC 2013 04345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to Technical Sergeant. Therefore, in view of the fact that we have determined the evidence is sufficient to conclude there was a causal nexus between the medical condition for which the applicant received a disability discharged and his ability to attain passing scores on his FAs, we also believe it is reasonable to conclude...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220

    Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00307

    Original file (BC-2013-00307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While the Board notes the recommendation from AFPC/DPSIM indicating that it was not until after his FA failure that he became restricted from...